Two ways to do it - Russian and American
Very interesting read over at
The Belmont Club.
It's a long one so I am just going to excerpt the first paragraph or so and let you wander over there and read the rest. I'll be here when you return and it is a fascinating read...
Brand A and Brand B
How well would a country with no almost no accountability to the public, able to apply unrestricted amounts of brutality and firepower and unconstrained by legal or humanitarian rights fare against a Jihadi foe? While those who believe that President Bush actually is Hitler may think the foregoing is a reference to the US campaign in Iraq, it is more accurately a reference to the Russian campaign in Chechnya.
The Russian campaign in Chechnya is interesting as a control case to Iraq not only because it lets the historian examine a counterinsurgency waged without American political constraints but also provides a real-world benchmark for what constitutes a truly brutal campaign as opposed to one only imagined that way by Hollywood directors like Brian de Palma. The Chechen campaign provides an an actual example of a counterinsurgency waged by an ex-socialist country compared to the actions of what has been described as a bestial colonial power, the United States of America. It's a contemporaneous side-by-side comparison by two different systems waged against a similar foe. And how have the two fared?
The answer will not be surprising to people who have been following the actual news from Iraq (as opposed to the MSM). Check out the
rest of this essay.
Posted by DaveH at November 28, 2007 8:58 PM
| TrackBack