Yeah Rigghhhtttt - California at it again
Excuse me but I am a bit confused -- is California a Nanny State or is it a Ninny State -- sometimes it's a bit hard to identify.
From the
AutoBlog:
California to reduce carbon emissions by... banning black cars?!
In a move that will likely get California's consumers in a huff, impending legislation may soon restrict the paint color options for Golden State residents looking for their next new vehicle. The specific colors that are currently on the chopping block are all dark hues, with the worst offender seemingly the most innocuous color you could think of: Black. What could California possibly have against these colors, you ask? Apparently, the California Air Resources Board figures that the climate control systems of dark colored cars need to work harder than their lighter siblings – especially after sitting in the sun for a few hours. Anyone living in a hot, sunny climate will tell you that this assumption is accurate, of course. In fact, legislation already exists for buildings that has proven successful at reducing the energy consumption of skyscrapers.
So, what's the crux of the problem... can't paint suppliers just come up with new, less heat-absorbent dark paints? According to Ward's, suppliers have reportedly been testing their pigments and processes to see if it's possible to meet CARB's proposed mandate of 20% solar reflectivity by 2016 with a phase-in period starting in 2012, and things aren't looking good. Apparently, when the proper pigments and chemicals are added to black paint, the resulting color is currently being referred to as "mud-puddle brown." That doesn't sound very attractive, now does it? Windshields, backlights and sunroofs are also slated to get reflective coatings starting in 2012.
When we first heard of this issue, an internal debate immediately began as to whether this might be an elaborate early April Fool's joke, but it isn't. Read through CARB's complete Cool Cars Standards and Test Procedures here (PDF link) for more.
Why don't they raise the reflectivity of the pavement -- this would serve to cool a much larger area and with the overall temperatures on the roadway reduced, there would be a resultant lessening of the cooling needed for the vehicle.
How about requiring a meter-square white panel on the top of the vehicle -- something with 95% reflectivity -- that would have a greater overall effect and not ruin the look of the car unless it was a low-slung sports car where the top of the roof would be highly visible.
How about convertibles? Hearses?
These micro-cephalics in office have a brain-fart and do not have the mental toolbox to parse the ramifications and to consider any alternatives.
Posted by DaveH at March 26, 2009 7:57 PM
| TrackBack