Examining WalMart
Jen and I make it our policy not to shop at Wal-Mart or Sam's Club. The company is known for poor treatment of its workers and harms the communities where it has stores. We much prefer Costco which pays its employees well, has a fantastic benefits package and still sells good stuff for very very cheap.
An interesting insight into Wal-Mart can be found at the
New York Review of Books
Here is one tidbit:
bq. One of the most telling of all the criticisms of Wal-Mart is to be found in a February 2004 report by the Democratic Staff of the House Education and Workforce Committee. In analyzing Wal-Mart's success in holding employee compensation at low levels, the report assesses the costs to US taxpayers of employees who are so badly paid that they qualify for government assistance even under the less than generous rules of the federal welfare system. For a two-hundred-employee Wal-Mart store, the government is spending $108,000 a year for children's health care; $125,000 a year in tax credits and deductions for low-income families; and $42,000 a year in housing assistance. The report estimates that a two-hundred-employee Wal-Mart store costs federal taxpayers $420,000 a year, or about $2,103 per Wal-Mart employee. That translates into a total annual welfare bill of $2.5 billion for Wal-Mart's 1.2 million US employees.
bq. Wal-Mart is also a burden on state governments. According to a study by the Institute for Labor and Employment at the University of California, Berkeley, in 2003 California taxpayers subsidized $20.5 million worth of medical care for Wal-Mart employees. In Georgia ten thousand children of Wal-Mart employees were enrolled in the state's program for needy children in 2003, with one in four Wal-Mart employees having a child in the program.[9]
Go
read the article for more, much much more...
Hat tip to
Brian Weaver at Grafyte -- his blog doesn't have permalinks but scroll down to the January 5 entry...
Posted by DaveH at January 6, 2005 8:11 PM