The Big Dig
Massachusetts blogger Bruce at
mASS BACKWARDS has the first of several posts up today outlining what is so horribly horribly wrong with the management of Boston's Big Dig -- a mammoth construction project that was supposed to remove some of the major traffic bottlenecks and move car traffic underground.
From Bruce:
The Inside Dirt - Vol. 1Stories from the Big Dig they don't want you to hear.
As promised, here is the first installment in a series of posts detailing my
personal observations from my years on the Big Dig (see
this post for additional information). As we prepare for takeoff, please fasten your seat belts, return your seats to a full upright position and secure the tray to the seatback in front of you.
The finger pointing has kicked into high gear over the disaster we call the Central Artery/Tunnel Project here in Boston (aka: The Big Dig, the Project). With every news story that comes out, the authorities seem to be getting closer and closer to the heart of the matter. Whether they actually figure it out is another story altogether. That is where yours truly comes in. Consider these posts a Public Service Announcement of sorts.
Bruce starts off with this Boston Globe article:
AG probes Big Dig firms; Romney rips Amorello
and starts digging in:
So, how does this oversight take place?
The Project, from the beginning, was divided up into many smaller projects, or contracts. These contracts would then individually be put out to bid, and awarded accordingly. This means the work on adjacent tunnel sections could be performed by different general contractors, both under the direct oversight of B/PB inspectors. There was nothing wrong with setting the project up this way. In fact, it makes perfect sense to have the oversight and inspection work done by a single agency, for reasons of coordination and consistency.
Let's look at what happens at ground level (or below ground, as the case may be). Every Big Dig contract has a field office for its B/PB staff, out of which a majority of oversight and record keeping is performed. The typical B/PB field office staff consists of a Resident Engineer, a Lead Field Engineer, Field Engineers (number depends on the scope of the work), Office Engineer, Claims and Changes Coordinator, and administrative personnel. Again, this is the "typical" field office set-up, and not a standard set-in-stone across the Project.
As work progresses, it is the responsibility of the Field Engineers to review the contract documents, and approved shop drawings and material submittals, to ensure the work is done in accordance with the specification requirements. For instance, if a concrete drawing shows epoxy-coated reinforcing bar, and the contractor were to try to cut corners by using plain steel rebar, it would be the job of the Field Engineer to alert the Contractor and make sure the error was corrected prior to signing off on the work.
There is a lot more at this site -- I am amazed that a company as otherwise well-run as Bechtel would let this project run away from them. Parsons is no slouch either...
Very much looking forward to parts two and three.
Went to Boston University and the freeways back in the 1980's were hellish.
Posted by DaveH at March 16, 2005 11:53 PM