Truth in the Media - Part Two
Condoleezza Rice recently gave an exclusive interview to the New York Times.
While talking about Israel's Gaza pullout she was quoted as saying: "It cannot be Gaza only"
Turns out the NY Times shuffled several parts of the interview and put the "It cannot be Gaza only" quote way out of context.
Charles at
LGF links to Rick Richman at
Jewish Current Issues who looked at the
State Department posted transcript of the interview and found some interesting variations...
Here is Rick Richman:
Condoleezza Rice and The New York Times
Last week, The New York Times published a story on their exclusive interview with Condoleezza Rice.
The first two paragraphs portrayed a Secretary of State focused, in the midst of a traumatic Israeli withdrawal, on signaling Israel that another one was next:Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on Wednesday offered sympathy for the Israeli settlers who are being removed from their homes in Gaza but also made it clear that she expected Israel and the Palestinians to take further steps in short order toward the creation of a Palestinian state.
"Everyone empathizes with what the Israelis are facing," Ms. Rice said in an interview. But she added, "It cannot be Gaza only."
Since the Roadmap calls for the dismantlement of Palestinian terrorist capabilities and infrastructure in Phase I -- and does not require Israel to remove a single settlement (other than certain "outposts") during that phase -- Rice’s comments seemed gratuitously insulting. One would have thought she would emphasize the need for the Palestinians -- after a unilateral Israeli withdrawal that went far beyond their initial Roadmap requirements -- to comply with their own Roadmap obligations.
On the day of the Times story, a commenter at LibertyPost.org posted this comment: "This just doesn't sound right, or like Dr Rice. . . . She doesn't screw up like this."
Indeed, it didn’t . . . she doesn’t . . .and in fact the Times made the quote up.
Rick then goes on:
The transcript of the interview was posted by the State Department this week. It shows that the purported quote -- made the centerpiece of the Times story -- was constructed by the Times from two separate, unrelated comments by Rice -- one taken out of context, the other not even accurately quoted.
Rick's analysis is lengthy and excerpts don't do it justice.
Visit his site to read the
whole thing.
Suffice to say, the NY Times doesn't come out of this looking very good.
Their lie and bias is very evident.
Posted by DaveH at August 26, 2005 11:51 AM
| TrackBack