November 19, 2009

Reading the emails - 1255352257.txt

Excerpted from 1255352257.txt posted Mon, 12 Oct 2009:
The fact is that we can't account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can't. The CERES data published in the August BAMS 09 supplement on 2008 shows there should be even more warming: but the data are surely wrong. Our observing system is inadequate.
Schadenfreude From the same email (scroll down to the bottom)
----- Forwarded Message -----
From: xxxx
To: xxxx
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2009 10:25:53 AM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: BBC U-turn on climate
Steve,
You may be aware of this already. Paul Hudson, BBC's reporter on climate change, on Friday wrote that there's been no warming since 1998, and that pacific oscillations will force cooling for the next 20-30 years. It is not outrageously biased in presentation as are other skeptics' views.

BBC has significant influence on public opinion outside the US.

Do you think this merits an op-ed response in the BBC from a scientist?
There were two embedded links in that email. The first is to this article at BBC News:
What happened to global warming?
This headline may come as a bit of a surprise, so too might that fact that the warmest year recorded globally was not in 2008 or 2007, but in 1998.

But it is true. For the last 11 years we have not observed any increase in global temperatures.

And our climate models did not forecast it, even though man-made carbon dioxide, the gas thought to be responsible for warming our planet, has continued to rise.

So what on Earth is going on?

Climate change sceptics, who passionately and consistently argue that man's influence on our climate is overstated, say they saw it coming.
The second link is to this post from Damian Thompson at The Telegraph:
The BBC's amazing U-turn on climate change
I think the BBC wanted to slip this one out quietly, but a Matt Drudge link put paid to that. The climate change correspondent of BBC News has admitted that global warming stopped in 1998 � and he reports that leading scientists believe that the earth�s cooling-off may last for decades.

�Whatever happened to global warming?� is the title of an article by Paul Hudson that represents a clear departure from the BBC�s fanatical espousal of climate change orthodoxy. The climate change campaigners will go nuts, particularly in the run-up to Copenhagen. So, I suspect, will devout believers inside the BBC. Hudson�s story was not placed very prominently by his colleagues � but a link right at the top of Drudge will have delivered at least a million page views, possibly many more.

Hudson�s piece is a U-turn � not because he has joined the ranks of sceptics who reject the theory of man-made global warming, but because at last he has written a story about the well-established fact that the earth�s temperature has not risen since 1998, and reports seriously the theories of climatologists (themselves not sceptics) who believe that we are in for 30 years of cooling caused by the falling temperatures of the oceans.
The next few weeks will be very interesting to say the least... Posted by DaveH at November 19, 2009 6:17 PM
Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?