James Lovelock recants
Hippie heads are going to assplode when they hear this.
From
Anthony Watts:
BREAKING: James Lovelock backs down on climate alarm
MSNBC reports that the lack of temperature rise in the last 12 years has convinced environmentalist James Lovelock ( The Gaia Hypothesis) that the climate alarmism wasn�t warranted.
From his Wikipedia entry: Writing in the British newspaper The Independent in January 2006, Lovelock argues that, as a result of global warming, �billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable� by the end of the 21st century.
He has been quoted in The Guardian that 80% of humans will perish by 2100 AD, and this climate change will last 100,000 years. According to James Lovelock, by 2040, the world population of more than six billion will have been culled by floods, drought and famine. Indeed �[t]he people of Southern Europe, as well as South-East Asia, will be fighting their way into countries such as Canada, Australia and Britain�.
What he has said to MSNBC is a major climb down. MSNBC reports in this story:James Lovelock, the maverick scientist who became a guru to the environmental movement with his �Gaia� theory of the Earth as a single organism, has admitted to being �alarmist� about climate change and says other environmental commentators, such as Al Gore, were too.
Lovelock, 92, is writing a new book in which he will say climate change is still happening, but not as quickly as he once feared.
He previously painted some of the direst visions of the effects of climate change. In 2006, in an article in the U.K.�s Independent newspaper, he wrote that �before this century is over billions of us will die and the few breeding pairs of people that survive will be in the Arctic where the climate remains tolerable.�
However, the professor admitted in a telephone interview with msnbc.com that he now thinks he had been �extrapolating too far��
Of course, the enviros will claim senility in 3... 2... 1...
Big difference between spending all of your time with computer models and actually going out and looking at the (non cherry-picked) data.
Posted by DaveH at April 23, 2012 5:35 PM